My junior year of
early-morning seminary, our teacher decided it would be fun to give each of us a specialized "award." Some were sweet. Some were silly. Most were very applicable. The award I was given?
The "
Can of Worms" award.
Yes - as far back as I can remember, I have had the ability to make something of nothing; to create chaos where peace has existed; to pretty much put my foot in my mouth. But this post is not about my ability to open said can of worms. I'm just preceding it with this explanation so that, in the case that some of you may be offended by what I'm about to say (which is possible), you can be comforted that I'm aware, and always have been, of the fact that sometimes I say too much, or simply,
in the wrong way.
Oh well. :)
So, here's my beef:
I don't understand, within the LDS Church, people who "want" leadership callings. More specifically, people who find
pride in either being, or being married to, someone in the Stake Presidency or Bishopric or Relief Society Presidency, etc.
Have I ever actually heard someone say, "I want to be in that calling" or "I want my spouse to be in that calling." Technically? No. But is there an air of pride and elitism when interacting with some of the people in these positions? Often? Yes.
And it totally irks me.
Why would a person WANT that kind of responsibility? Why would anyone actually crave the kind of stress, pressure, and responsibility those positions put on a person?
To quote my 5-year-old, Malia:
"I have a hypothesis"
(Yes. She actually says this).
For some reason, they have this cock-eyed, misconstrued idea that being in one of those callings somehow shows the rest of the members of their ward/stake how awesome they are. That, somehow, when extended such a calling, they are being proven to be among the more righteous members of the assembly. That, somehow, when asked to fulfill such duties, it's God's way of saying, "You're better than the rest of those insignificant peons."
Don't tell me you haven't met these people. They have that conspicuous demeanor. And I'm not implying that all the people I've ever known in these positions are this way. On the contrary, I've been fortunate to know many aren't. But the few that are, really...
grate... on me. And it seems ironic, doesn't it? That these people see these callings where they are being asked to serve a large number of people, humbly, in God's name, as some sort of "badge" of honor and righteousness?
When David and I lived in
Wymount, we lived in the most amazing ward of wonderful people. Something funny happened where, one week, I asked David, totally randomly, if he ever had the desire to be in the Bishopric. "No freaking way," was his reply. "I don't need that kind of stress and responsibility."
No lie - the next week he was called to be in the bishopric.
A while back, in our current ward, the stake president called, wanting to speak to David. I joked that he was going to be the
Elder's Quorum President. "No thank you," he remarked. He was called as 2nd counselor *relief.* A few months later, the EQ President moved. Dave is now President. Now, realize, please, that he fulfills his calling to the best of his ability, and he never says no to any calling, no matter what. I'm just saying - someone who truly is worthy to serve in such a calling shouldn't WANT that calling, but be willing to serve in it to their greatest capacity.
I have absolutely no desire to be Relief Society President. And knowing full well that the fear that I'll say something stupid will most likely keep a Bishop from ever extending me that call, brings me great relief. If I were ever asked to serve in that capacity, would I do it? Of course. Have I ever said no to a calling? Nope. But I'm just saying, I wouldn't pick it for myself were I given the choice. I'm just not... "good enough." But then again, in my opinion, anyone who is asked to fill that position should feel the same. Then, they would be more willing to seek the Lord to aide them, and it would also create an accessibility to them that would make them really successful in serving in their calling, I think.
Have I ever actually heard a woman say, "I want to be Relief Society President! Oooo, pick me! Pick me!"? Not in those words, no. But I've heard it in the cutting remarks I hear when a woman criticizes the leadership of anyone in the ward or when they refer to the time when they were in that position and were so much more capable. And I've seen it in their faces when they knowingly glance through the corner of their eyes at each other in that pious way that some people do; the kind of people who don't really know what it means to actually seek approval from the Lord.
Honestly. I have met some nursery leaders who are some of the most amazing women I've ever encountered. Why we have that whole, "Some callings mean you're the better-est" dynamic, I don't know.
And it bugs me.
And if I were ever called to be the Relief Society President, it's the first thing I think I'd work to change.
... and that would be the only reason I'd ever "want" it. But otherwise, I'd like to stick with "lowly choir director" for as long as possible, thank you.